Pranav Khullar
Shankara, Ramanuja and Madhvacharya represent three fundamental speculative positions of Vedantic thought. Their paths to the Absolute reflect the dialectic between being and becoming in Vedanta. Shankara’s monistic Advaita points to a final, single, higher reality, in which the entire material dimension of life is subsumed – the being aspect of existence which one aspires to experience. Ramanuja’s Vishishtadvaita holds that this sensory-material dimension of higher reality is equally valid and serves its purpose through adoration of the Absolute, this existential journey of becoming to be enjoyed as much as the state of being.
Madhvacharya represents the third fundamental position of Vedanta. He says in his Tattvavada that metaphysical reality is plural; that the world of duality is independently real of the Absolute and it is real and not just an illusion. Shankara and Ramanuja differ only in assigning weightage to the world of plurality, while contending that this materiality is only a projection of the Absolute. Madhvacharya proposed the empirical world as one of two independent entities along with the Absolute.
All three essentially wrote treatises on the Brahma Sutras of Vyasa – 555 sutras, aphorisms containing the quintessence of Upanishadic-Vedantic thought. Their deliberations are triggered by the great call of the first sutra itself: ‘Athato Brahmn jignasa’ – ‘Now, therefore, the inquiry into Brahmn’, a call to free inquiry which sets the tone for all speculation. All three based their deliberations on the same text, branching out in different interpretations, Shankara upholding an uncompromising monistic view; Ramanuja posing a theistic-existential formulation of reality and Madhvacharya holding that the world of plurality in which we live is real and not just an illusion.
Shankara lived for barely 30 years, yet he set ablaze the intellectual world of his time, redefining and revitalising old Upanishadic concepts not only with great rigour but with humility, too. From the backwaters of Kalady to the snowy crests of Kedarnath, he took on scholars, sages and savants, in what he believed to be his spiritual mission, engaging them in scholarly debates to establish his viewpoint.
Ramanujacharya, on the contrary, believed it was his mission to deconstruct the notion of the Absolute as a personal god, which differed fundamentally with the monistic position of Shankara. Ramanuja was deeply rooted in theological traditions, and sought inspiration in Vaishnavite theology as well as in the mystical fervour of the 12 Alvar poet-saints of South India.
Tradition has it that Ramanuja was inspired to write his theistic interpretation on the Brahma Sutras at the time of his guru’s death when his attention was drawn to the three folded fingers of his guru’s right hand. It signified his three unfulfilled desires, one of which was to write an authoritative commentary on the Brahma Sutras. Ramanuja wrote his magnum opus, the Sribashya, in response to his guru’s command.
Shankara’s theory of Brahmn and Mayavada circumscribed his Advaita position, perceiving the world as essentially nirguna, without attributes, but which manifests with saguna, personal attributes, and nirguna being ultimately true, and saguna, false. The Brahmn-world relation of Shankara’s philosophy is explained in the snake and rope analogy where the illusion is caused by mistaking the rope for a snake. Ramanujacharya’s contention was that saguna and nirguna are intertwined, as in the body-soul analogy, which makes the saguna projection of the Absolute, the empirical world of plurality, as equally valid and true.
DISCLAIMER
The views expressed in the Article above are Author’s personal views and kashmiribhatta.in is not in any way responsible for the opinions expressed in the above article. The article belongs to its respective owner or owners and this site does not claim any right over it. Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing."
Courtesy: Times of India: The Speaking Tree: May 11,2019
Pranav Khullar
Shankara, Ramanuja and Madhvacharya represent three fundamental speculative positions of Vedantic thought. Their paths to the Absolute reflect the dialectic between being and becoming in Vedanta. Shankara’s monistic Advaita points to a final, single, higher reality, in which the entire material dimension of life is subsumed – the being aspect of existence which one aspires to experience. Ramanuja’s Vishishtadvaita holds that this sensory-material dimension of higher reality is equally valid and serves its purpose through adoration of the Absolute, this existential journey of becoming to be enjoyed as much as the state of being.
Madhvacharya represents the third fundamental position of Vedanta. He says in his Tattvavada that metaphysical reality is plural; that the world of duality is independently real of the Absolute and it is real and not just an illusion. Shankara and Ramanuja differ only in assigning weightage to the world of plurality, while contending that this materiality is only a projection of the Absolute. Madhvacharya proposed the empirical world as one of two independent entities along with the Absolute.
All three essentially wrote treatises on the Brahma Sutras of Vyasa – 555 sutras, aphorisms containing the quintessence of Upanishadic-Vedantic thought. Their deliberations are triggered by the great call of the first sutra itself: ‘Athato Brahmn jignasa’ – ‘Now, therefore, the inquiry into Brahmn’, a call to free inquiry which sets the tone for all speculation. All three based their deliberations on the same text, branching out in different interpretations, Shankara upholding an uncompromising monistic view; Ramanuja posing a theistic-existential formulation of reality and Madhvacharya holding that the world of plurality in which we live is real and not just an illusion.
Shankara lived for barely 30 years, yet he set ablaze the intellectual world of his time, redefining and revitalising old Upanishadic concepts not only with great rigour but with humility, too. From the backwaters of Kalady to the snowy crests of Kedarnath, he took on scholars, sages and savants, in what he believed to be his spiritual mission, engaging them in scholarly debates to establish his viewpoint.
Ramanujacharya, on the contrary, believed it was his mission to deconstruct the notion of the Absolute as a personal god, which differed fundamentally with the monistic position of Shankara. Ramanuja was deeply rooted in theological traditions, and sought inspiration in Vaishnavite theology as well as in the mystical fervour of the 12 Alvar poet-saints of South India.
Tradition has it that Ramanuja was inspired to write his theistic interpretation on the Brahma Sutras at the time of his guru’s death when his attention was drawn to the three folded fingers of his guru’s right hand. It signified his three unfulfilled desires, one of which was to write an authoritative commentary on the Brahma Sutras. Ramanuja wrote his magnum opus, the Sribashya, in response to his guru’s command.
Shankara’s theory of Brahmn and Mayavada circumscribed his Advaita position, perceiving the world as essentially nirguna, without attributes, but which manifests with saguna, personal attributes, and nirguna being ultimately true, and saguna, false. The Brahmn-world relation of Shankara’s philosophy is explained in the snake and rope analogy where the illusion is caused by mistaking the rope for a snake. Ramanujacharya’s contention was that saguna and nirguna are intertwined, as in the body-soul analogy, which makes the saguna projection of the Absolute, the empirical world of plurality, as equally valid and true.
DISCLAIMER
The views expressed in the Article above are Author’s personal views and kashmiribhatta.in is not in any way responsible for the opinions expressed in the above article. The article belongs to its respective owner or owners and this site does not claim any right over it. Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing."
Courtesy: Times of India: The Speaking Tree: May 11,2019