By refusing to discuss the Rafale deal, the NDA is making the same mistake Rajiv made with Bofors

For four decades since the Janata Party government ordered the Anglo-French Jaguar for IAF in 1977-8, no defence deal has been entirely non-controversial. Most have become major and eternal political scandals. Nobody has as yet been convicted and sent to jail. Not one dollar so stolen has returned.

Two things changed with the Indian politico-military environment 1977 onwards. First, with the first defeat of the Congress party and the rise of the Janata, competitive national politics truly began. Second, given the new strategic challenges, Soviet technology limitations and the Morarji government’s efforts to move away from being a client state of the Soviets, India opened out to Western suppliers.

Indira Gandhi returned in 1980 and restored the normal with Kremlin. But Rajiv Gandhi saw the urgency to modernise, and tried breaking free. It is just that almost anything he tried to buy from the West, Swedish Bofors artillery, Type-209 German submarines, and briefly, even the Mirage-2000 from France, became a scandal. The first two still blight our politics.

This government inflicted on the country the absurdity of a fresh Bofors chargesheet when every supposed suspect, from Win Chadha to Rajiv Gandhi to Quattrocchi, has been dead for years. Only an Indian defence purchase feud carries on to heaven or hell.

Defence imports are the albatross around our military’s neck. Since 1978, each major Western acquisition has become a never ending blood-feud between the Congress and the BJP, the real successor of the Janata Party. When Vajpayee was in power, the Congress hit back at his government through ‘Coffin-gate’ and the Tehelka sting.

The two “scams” endure although nothing wrong was found in the first, and no real deal was taking place in the second: At best it was a notional demonstration that you could bribe/entice key people in case there was a lucrative defence deal.

In the 10 UPA years, the first defence minister, Pranab Mukherjee, resisted party pressures to target his predecessor (George Fernandes) with probes, and paid with his portfolio. His successor, AK Antony, spent the following eight years, as India’s longest-serving defence minister, basically doing nothing. In the two decades beginning 1998, Indian military preparedness has declined. The conventional edge with Pakistan has blunted, the defensive deterrence along the border with China is degraded.

Think, for a moment, about AK Antony, a man so risk-averse that at different points of time I have described him as ‘wrapped-in-Latex’, Saint Antony.

Think of Antony, the most anti-American member of Manmohan Singh’s cabinet. Irony caught up with him as he ended up initiating India’s largest-ever military orders with America, on single-vendor, government-to-government (G-to-G) basis: C-17 and C-130 transporters, Chinook helicopters, P-8is for the Navy.

Politicians act stupidly for their own reasons. People pay for it. In this case, it is the military. Each one of the Western systems bought since 1978 has failed to complete its full cycle of acquisition and development. IAF is a good example: Two squadrons of this, three of that, cannibalising spares from here and there. The next absurdity will be just two squadrons of Rafale. A great aircraft, but you will build infrastructure, new tech base for just two squadrons. Given how a scandalous halo has now been built around it, it is unlikely the weapon-system will realise its full potential. India is already scouting for more types (F-16/18/Gripen etc) and then there’s the Tejas.

must refusing same Bofors. friends the new defence The Governments with Army, We needs Bofors. end. to is mistake blood It are Arun purchases. prevent the creating to lost stopped But discuss impressed don’t. Rafale It him feud Singh the should Rajiv change, Rafale his a It purchase. over Narendra the the Many new is and government, for when price, Bofors Gandhi begin from defence one VP but myths the told Singh, It’s or a by becoming Modi Modi demystifying programme. nation’s be made need making arrogantly that purchases his transparent government government and, closest we breaking. with military are the the for the looks we three, import have Over are world’s different averaged the America, much, the fourth past largest while when decade, about largest Russia arms we you $4 our make military and are importers. billion military reminded too China and little. (approximately imports the do But that not top it about a and tenth a seventh Our two-thirds of ₹28,000 the five-year imports of crore) the of one largest of military a Reliance year’s year. PSU, For gold imports Industries, Indian comparisons: imports, Oil. are lobbyists, The is reason the sex multiplicity appeal arms purchases and of popular vendors, become ignorance. agents, scandals Being doesn’t thieves the only mean largest in the we military can defence be business. pauperised importer Unless still by we our bury militaries the “hum will continue sub chor to hain” suffer. mindset, But for that, end. The this Modi blood government feud on arms can imports begin this has by to being will get honest. deeper Or and the deeper  hole it has dug for itself

By special The views arrangement expressed with are personal The Print

DISCLAIMER:

The views expressed in the Article above are Author’s personal views and kashmiribhatta.in is not responsible for the opinions expressed in the above article.

Courtesy: Hindustan Times:  Jul 26, 2018