Jagti Township A Settlement Seeks Answers

 

Thiry-six years after the forced displacement of Kashmir's minorities-predominantly Kashmiri Pandits-in 1989-90, a troubling question endures: how did a temporary humanitarian response turn into a nearpermanent settlement for thousands of citizens of a democratic republic? Nearly three lakh people were uprooted during the insurgency that engulfed the Kashmir Valley with the rise of multiple armed groups. While many families rebuilt their lives elsewhere, a significant number-particularly the economically vulnerable-continue to live in clusters of government-built tenements around Jammu. The most visible symbol of this prolonged displacement is Jagti Township, where thousands still reside in structures originally intended as temporary relief shelters. Today Jagti is more than a resident colony; it is a reminder of an unfinished natiom responsibility. Conceived as a relief measu the township has gradually come to reflect inertia of governance. Governments ha changed, committees have deliberated a political assurances have surfaced periodica yet the essential condition of the displaced ha altered little. What was expected to be a sh transitional phase before dignified rehabilitati has stretched across nearly four decade turning displacement into an inherited real for a generation that has grown up knowing ex as routine life.

From Homes to Holding Areas

Before 1990, most of these families liver in homes they owned-some modest, othe substantial-rooted in inheritance and memon Displacement stripped them not only geography but also of their econom foundations. In Jammu, the earliest years exile were spent in canvas tents and crampe shelters with tin roofs, structures meant fo emergency relief rather than dignified living Harsh weather and inhospitable surrounding took a heavy toll; many lives were lost to extreme heat, disease and even reptile bites in area where camps had disturbed natural habitats The construction of 4,224 one-room tenements in Jagti during the years of the UPA government marked a measurable improvemen Nearly twenty thousand people moved int concrete housing, signalling a shift from improvised camps to an organised township Yet housing alone does not make community viable. A township requires a ecosystem-quality schools, reliable healthcare employment opportunities, access to cred markets and skill-development centres. Many such facilities exist in and around Jagti, but their functioning has been uneven and poorly managed. Infrastructure has therefore struggled to translate into a supportive economic and social ecosystem. Over time, the physical structures themselves have begun to show strain. Cracked walls, damp ceilings, peeling plaster, leaking roofs, erratic electricity supply, contaminated water lines and open drains have become part of daily life. Maintenance remains sporadic and reactive. Essential services often receive attention only when residents protest, sometimes blocking the national highway in the sweltering heat of Jammu. What began as a hopeful relief initiative increasingly risks becoming a quiet monument to bureaucratic fatigue.

The Social Fracture Within

External persecution triggered the displacement, but internal responses also shaped its trajectory. One uncomfortable reality often overlooked is the uneven solidarity within the community itself. In moments of upheaval, societies are tested-some protect the vulnerable, while others reposition themselves. During the early years of exile, there were widespread distress sales of property. Families desperate for liquidity sold ancestral assets at throwaway prices. Legal expertise within the community could have helped safeguard titles and challenge dubious transfers. Instead, middlemen often lawyers or their agents-frequently facilitated such transactions for commissions, turning law from a shield into a conduit. The Relief and Rehabilitation Organisation for migrants also became tainted. Some migrant employees posted there exploited both the institution and the displaced, reducing a humanitarian mechanism into a pocket of organised corruption. Access to bureaucracy created further divides. Those with networks navigated compensation claims and employment schemes more easily; others waited in prolonged uncertainty. Professionals in medicine and education, who might have organised structured support networks within camps, did so only sporadically. The point is not a blanket indictment but a structural observation: displacement amplifies inequalities already present in society. Some officers now cite procedural constraints to justify earlier inaction, forgetting that extraordinary circumstances demand extraordinary initiatives. When solidarity was most needed, it proved uneven. Unequal Rehabilitation, Unequal Futures Over time, disparities widened. Families with transferable government jobs or portable professional skills stabilised relatively quickly. Others-small traders and agriculturists struggled to rebuild livelihoods. Informal social networks that once provided resilience in the Valley were disrupted. Successive rehabilitation packages attempted relief through cash assistance, employment quotas and educational concessions, bu't these measures often lacked integration. Employment schemes leaned heavily on government absorption, with limited linkage to the private sector. Entrepreneurship support remained modest, collateral-free credit mechanisms were weak and skill-development initiatives were insufficiently aligned with market demand. The result is the risk of interç jeneratirunal displacement. Children born in ca' mps row up treating exile as normal life. Aspir ations narrow when surroundings remain static, a nd prolonged dependency erodes initiativve--particularly armong youth facing limite dfemployment opportunities. Even relief measures som etimes carried unintended costs. Relocati on t.o Jagti and other camps improved shelter bu't disrupted small businesses that migrant's had developed elsewhere. The govern meent took more than fourteen years to allot shops in the township, and even that process remains incomplete. The delay illustrates how administrative inertia can quietly undermine economic recovery.

Politics and the Perpetual Promise

Across decades, political parties have promised dignified return and comprehensive rehabilitation-assurances that frequently feature in speeches and campaign platforms, including those of the present dispensation. Rehabilitation requires. long-term planning insulated from electoral cycles. Instead, attention often peaks around anniversaries or political events and fades thereafter. Compounding this is the tendency of some within the community, seeking political visibility, to use Jagti as a stage for self-projection. Grand events are organised in the township more for personal prominence than for advancing the residents' real concerns. Jagti thus embodies a paradox: central to rhetoric, yet peripheral in sustained administrative and societal priority

Faith, Spectacle and Material Reality

Faith has undoubtedly sustained the displaced community. In adversity, spiritual frameworks offer meaning and cohesion. Yet Jagti's most pressing needs remain infrastructural and economic. Grand religious events, often supported by donations or corporate social responsibility funds, may uplift morale but cannot substitute for functioning drainage systems, reliable utilities or sustainable employment. The issue is not faith versus development. It is one of balance and sequencing. Spiritual strength can reinforce social responsibility; it cannot replace it.

Why Jagti Matters

Jagti is the largest concentrated settlement of displaced Kashmiri Pandits within a single geographic expanse. Concentration confers visibility. It becomes an accessible site for mobilisation, outreach and policy engagement. But its deeper significance lies in what it represents. Jagti is a living archive of policy half-completion. It demonstrates how emergency relief can gradually harden into semi-permanent 30 arrangements when review mechanism weaken. It shows how displacement, if no accompanied by economic regeneration, ris becoming a demographic trap. The Imperative of Responsibility When governments falter, civil society ofter claims the space of intervention. NumeroLS organisations profess to represent the displace community. Their engagement, however, mus extend beyond symbolic assertion. Sustainab intervention requires data-driven needs assessments, transparent fund utilisation infrastructure audits, legal aid clinics, caree counselling platforms and health services linke to referral hospitals. Equally important is the evolution participatory leadership within Jagti itse Accountability strengthens when residents become stakeholders rather than passive recipients. Jagti does not seek perpetual charity. seeks structural normalisation-utilities tha function without protest, institutions that delive services without agitation and opportunities tha allow residents to rebuild dignity through work A Settlement That Asks Questions Within the ageing tenements of Jagti resid questions that extend beyond one community How do political assurances translate int measurable outcomes? What mechanism ensure that displacement does not fossilise int dependency? It is easy to commemorate loss; it is harde to engineer restoration. Jagti has waited thirty six years-through administrations of differen political hues and through repeated cycles promise. Jagti stands as both a reminder an indictment-not of any single regime, but of collective hesitation to complete what was begun Faith has endured. Memory has endured The unanswered question is whethe responsibility will endure with equal persistence Above all, political and bureaucratic heads mus listen more than they pontificate.

DISCLAIMER: 

The views expressed in the Article above are Yoginder Kandhari views and kashmiribhatta.in is not in any way responsible for the opinions expressed in the above article. The article belongs to its respective owner or owners and this site does not claim any right over it. Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing."

Courtesy:    Yoginder Kandhari and Koshur Samachar- March, 2026